Add a comment

 

Re: Do you have a terms of reference for the software architecture role?

Great post, Simon. The one thing I'd suggest is expanding the description of Architecture Evolution to read "Ownership of the architecture throughout the delivery/product lifecycle". For in-house IT (and ISVs, for that matter), a focus on the product versus the project is something I consider critical. The architect role is best positioned to plan for future changes that will be imposed on the product by its environment/major dependencies (OS, DBMS, etc.) in addition to those that will come from the evolution of the product's feature set.

Re: Do you have a terms of reference for the software architecture role?


Title
Body
HTML : b, strong, i, em, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li, sub, sup
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me Yes  No 

E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).