Add a comment

 

Re: .NET systems need software architecture too

I think you've asked a good question about whether "the Microsoft way" is simply taken as the default. I think it is in some parts of the community, but not others. I've recently noticed another facet of this lack of discussion of architecture in the Microsoft community: there is very little community engagement in Microsoft's supposedly open discussion of architectural guidelines. It's almost as if the community is split into two groups: one group doesn't comment because they feel that architecture is something that emanates from Microsoft; and the other group doesn't comment because they think Microsoft won't listen.

Re: .NET systems need software architecture too


Title
Body
HTML : b, strong, i, em, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li, sub, sup
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me Yes  No 

E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).